Clouds, Climate and Cosmic Rays

The clouds are making and breaking the Climate Change.  that is very interesting, as Global Warming due to manmade carbon dioxide is shown to be a total fraud.  Henri Svensmark complains they could not get the paper published.  It took them 16 months to get it published, due to resistance from the Anthropogenic Climate Change from carbon dioxide.  What a dictatorship for genocide against human beings.

Republicans Getting Nervous on Economy, Unemployment

What's an environmentalist to do?  In the midst of the collapse, several states,

including Michigan, Missouri and Arkansas, are cutting back on

the number of weeks workers may collect state unemployment

benefits, which generally has been 26 weeks. Michigan and

Missouri are cutting back to 20 weeks, Arkansas to 25. This will

also affect (shorten) the time workers can collect extended

benefits (paid for by state and Federal dollars) since they are

calculated from formulas based on these numbers.

{Pediatrics} website today posted an undercover study of

Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Plan recipients, which

revealed that dentists are reluctant to treat Medicaid-insured

children. Some 32% of Medicaid-enrolled dentists in Illinois

refused to even see a hypothetical 10-year-old child with a

chipped tooth. For unenrolled dentists, the refusal rate was 93%.

Illinois, like 25 other states, reimburses dentists just 53% of

the "median usual fees," when the national average is 60.5%

The liberal think tank Campaign for America's Future has a

post detailing the plight of black unemployment. Author Terrance

Heath quotes numerous sources on the theme "our Recession ain't

like yours," because of "economic pre-existing conditions." Many

U.S. blacks are only one generation removed from the days of

extreme poverty and segregation, and now face the loss of all

gains, meager as they might have been.

With this background, it is notable that U.S. Senator Scott

Brown (R-Mass.) penned an opinion piece in {Politico}, today,

entitled "Why I Don't Back Paul Ryan's Medicare Plan." Brown

notes that, as health inflation continues, the burden on the

elderly will outstrip government premium support, and that,

"Medicare has already taken [more than a half-trillion in] cuts

to help pay for Obama's health care plan," again noting the

effect on the elderly. This statement, coming as it does from the

original Tea Party standard-bearer, will likely have significant

repurcussions in the budget debate.

Within the last days, articles have appeared which show that

the Medicare issue was hotly contested during the GOP fight over

what became the Ryan budget proposal, with many Republicans

hesitant to try and defend such draconian austerity. Polls at the

time were showing that it had a "toxicity rating" only equalled

by ObamaCare. Gone are the days when a mere four House

Republicans had the gumption to vote against it.

Time to force through Glass-Steagall. [mpb/fhb]

Green Dictatorship Fight

Green Dictatorship is being resisted, read this.
STOCKHOLM, May 19, 2011 (EIRNS)--The intervention against


Schellnhuber at the Ig-Nobel Symposium continued in the evening

of the first day, and through into the third day, as we still are

waiting for the last reports coming in. We have hit the symposium

again and again. At the evening concert the first day, the banner

and placards broke the cocktail party atmosphere. Here,

bureaucrats of all kinds of institutions and sponsors of the

Symposium got Hussein's leaflet (see May 17 briefing). We were

already well known with the Nobel Laureates, who all said they

got the leaflet already. Schellnhuber, again, could not take it

and just closed himself up like an oyster, stuck his nose up in

the air, and walked right by.

Back at the Academy of Sciences, the next day, we put up the

banner to reach the press conference, but lo and behold, we got

the whole bunch. The lunch was served in a side building, so we

could again show the banner, placards and leaflets to the

participants, who this time were reinforced with many members

from the "UN High-Level Panel on Global Sustainability," with its

chairman, Finnish President Tarja Halonen, walking by. Again the

participants commented. One of them stepped forward, saying,

"Give me your material, I always read both sides." He got the

{EIR} on WBGU. Another attempted to joke, "Your document was

almost as good as ours." When they saw the banner and the sign,

they stopped and read them with growing amazement. Former

International Atomic Energy Agency head Hans Blix also walked by

in the whole group, but the same day he broke ranks by making a

statement defending nuclear power.

We showed Third World delegates the statue of race biologist

Anders Retzius and shortly briefed them on the parallel to

today's talk about sustainability. Several Finnish journalists

also appreciated seeing how the Swedes had neglected to tidy up

the park by leaving the statue in place after the Second World

War. The Finnish TV and other camera crews filmed us, and all

photographers took pictures. Swedish radio interviewed Kjell with

a half-hidden microphone.

Today we hit them again outside the Royal Drama Theater, now

with the leaflet translated into Swedish. More than half of the

audience of several hundreds were young people. Four of our youth

organizers/contacts went inside and will report later.

The conclusions of Schellnhuber's Nobel Laureate Symposium

is in some ways worse than the WBGU report. The so-called

"Stockholm Memorandum" includes a section in the direct tradition

of the race science ideas of "excessive populations." It is

called "6. Reducing Human Pressures" and includes the code words

"reproductive health services," which in UN lingo means things

like contraceptives, birth-control pills, abortions, and

sterilizations, voluntary or not. "Such measures are important in

their own right but will also reduce birth rates," crows the

section. In fact, in 1982, the Nobel Prize for Medicine was

awarded to the Swedish inventors of the abortion pill, Sune K.

Bergström, Bengt I. Samuelsson, John R. Vane.

However, sensationally, the Nobel Laureates refused to sign

away nuclear and carbon power. This was a direct slap in the face

of Schellnhuber, who, instead of getting prestigious support for

the energy transformation of Germany, now has a counter-proposal.

This was probably the reason for the overnight negotiations about

the Memorandum.

Lyndon LaRouche's diagnosis was that Blix and others "made

it impolitic for Schellnhuber to try to continue that discussion

on that occasion. These guys are not going to quit because of

Blix. What they will do, is what they always do: whenever

they're defeated, they'll deny it happened."

The rejected section reads as follows:

"2. Managing the Climate -- Energy Challenge: We urge

governments to agree on global emission reductions guided by

science and embedded in ethics and justice. At the same time, the

energy needs of the 3 billion people who lack access to reliable

sources of energy need to be fulfilled. Global efforts need to:

"* Keep global warming below 2 degrees C, implying a peak in

global CO2 emissions no later than 2015 and recognize that even a

warming of 2 degrees C carries a very high risk of serious

impacts and the need for major adaptation efforts.

"* Put a sufficiently high price on carbon and deliver the

G-20 commitment to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, using these

funds to contribute to the several hundred billion U.S. dollars

per year needed to scale up investments in renewable energy."

Gaia Global Warming on the March

Gaia and the Green Environmentalist mafia want blood, and are moving in Germany, where Schellnhuber is a big body of Obama's John Holdren.  The genocidalist Hans-Joachim "John"


Schellnhuber, is not only Angela Merkel's so-called science

advisor, but he seems to function as the alter ego to President

Obama's science advisor John Holdren.

Schellnhuber and Holdren are long-time associates and

collaborators, rubbing shoulders long before Holdren was

appointed by Obama. They are both affiliated with the

Sustainability Science Program at Harvard's Kennedy School of

Government's Center for International Development. Together,

Schellnhuber and Holdren participated in the American Association

for the Advancement of Science 2007 Annual Meeting on February

17, 2007, in a symposium on "Grand Challenges in Sustainability

Science." At the time, Holdren was the AAAS president.

The Aspen Institute's "2009 Energy Solutions Summit" brought

Schellnhuber together with various Obama Administration

officials, including Holdren and two top U.S. Department of

Energy officials, as well as other environmentalists from

academia and private think tanks.

For a number of years, a group calling itself the "Climate

Change Emergency Medical Response" has frequently cited

Schellnhuber and Holdren together in the same breath. The group

identifies itself as follows: "We are professionals concerned

about climate change and anyone else who agrees with Al Gore, UN

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, eminent senior climate-change

scientists such as James Hansen, John Holdren, Hans Schellnhuber,

and Bill Hare, that we are beyond dangerous interference with the

climate system, and have reached a state of planetary emergency."

A recent statement by them calls upon the medical profession

to treat climate change, that is, "dangerous anthropogenic

interference (DAI) with the climate system," as a medical

emergency: "Obviously the world is now far beyond DAI," the

statement declares, "and fortunately this has been acknowledged

by long-standing climate change scientists such as James Hansen,

John Holdren, Hans Schellnhuber, Bill Hare, and Andrew Glickson."

Although a close collaborator of Holdren, Schellnhuber

realized that this wasn't enough to get the U.S. government to go

along with his insanity. In 2009, Schellnhuber briefed Obama

Administration officials (some say it included Obama, personally)

on his demands for drastic reductions in carbon emissions, and he

later reported that they had chided him that his findings were

not "grounded in political reality" because "the [U.S.] Senate

will never agree to this." Schellnhuber had insisted that the

U.S. must reduce its emissions from its current 20 tons of carbon

per person average to zero tons per person by 2020.

Consequently, anticipating that the U.S. would not go along

with the December 2009 Copenhagen climate summit's genocidal

goals, Schellnhuber attacked the United States as "climate

illiterate." Speaking at Britain's Oxford University in September

2009, he said the chance of getting an agreement at Copenhagen

was "pie in the sky" because rich countries like America were

unwilling to sign up to ambitious enough targets. "In a sense the

U.S. is climate illiterate.... If you look at global polls about

what the public knows about climate change even in Brazil, China,

you have more people who know about the problem and think deep

cuts in emissions are needed." The Guardian noted that

Schellnhuber's statements came while British Prime Minister

Gordon Brown was demanding that rich countries cut emissions by

80 per cent by 2050 while also paying poor countries to reduce

greenhouse gases.

Schellnhuber is candid about his top-down advisory control.

When he returned to Germany in 2005 from England, where he had

worked closely Prime Minister Tony Blair (Blair wrote the forward

to a propaganda book, {Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change} edited

by Schellnhuber and others), he said he was approached by German

government officials for scientific advice. "But I was very

snobbish, I have to confess .... I said, I'm not interested in

giving advice to secretaries of state; I would only do it for the

federal chancellor! And I got my way."

Kansas City Royals Texas Rangers Baseball Spring

Forget about global warming, it's time for baseball.  Do you want to get some kansas city royals tickets? 

Then, get texas rangers tickets.  then there are the oakland athletics tickets.  It's spring, time for baseball.

Earthquakes, Tornadoes and the Galaxy

All right, the other aspect of this whole process, when you


look at this from the galactic context, galactic and solar

processes, on which we have no control on Earth itself; we don't

control these things from Earth! But we're able to respond to

them. And our response is, we have to increase our power.

Mankind has to increase our capacity to be able to begin to

reach out and control these things that threaten us. We know

that we can not control certain things without controlling the

galactic aspect of it, as well as the Solar System aspect of it.

hmm? You have to reach out to these things, not sit here on

earth, and say, "I control this thing from my desk" -- you don't!

You control these things, by what the universe is. The universe

is based on a principle of universal creativity. It's not based

on the existence of a fixed thing: It's based on a {principle of

development of universal self-creativity}, that's our universe.

It's {self}-creative.

Now, what we do, when we're smart, we do the same thing the

universe does: We exercise creativity. We find an accord with

the universe's creativity, in ourselves, in our work. We express

it, on Earth. The one thing, which I deal -- I'm writing up some

of this stuff in a short piece, which will be completed tomorrow.

I've got the draft done of the first chapter, and the fixing,

shall we say, so far; it'll be finished tomorrow, which will deal

with the second thing I'll come to, which is part of the same

thing.

Okay, so that's our situation: That we must be able, to

understand processes. Let's take the case, of a very simple

thing: We're dealing with earthquakes, which are part of the same

thing as volcanoes, and which we have just demonstrated to our

own satisfaction, are the basis for our weather system! Our

weather system is related entirely, to the function of

earthquakes and volcanoes, as we've seen in the recent wave of

tornadoes! And the increase of tornadoes, and we're going to get

bigger ones, probably in this month. Because we've been getting

May tornadoes in the month of April. Which means that the month

of May is not very promising, when you see what's already

happened in certain parts of the United States since.